Buneti Saikiran Goud, v. The State Of Telangana
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.8436 OF 2026 DATE : 17.06.2026 Between :
Buneti Saikiran Goud S/o.Kamalamma.
...Petitioner/
Accused And The State of Telangana, Rep.byt its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State, of Telangana, Hyderabad.
... Respondent Complainant
ORDER
This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioner/Accused seeking to enlarge him on bail in connection with Crime No.506 of 2026 of Patancheru Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. The offence alleged against the petitioner is punishable under Section 109 of the BNS Act.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that on 05.04.2026 at about 17:20 hours at Laxmi Durga Wines Shop near ORR, Indrasham road, Patancheru, the accused
attacked on the injured, abused and assaulted him with a beer bottle over his head and neck keeping in mind previous grudges, due to which the complainant's son sustained severe bleeding injuries and cut injury over his neck and shifted to Dhruva Hospital. Hence, he requested the police to take necessary action against the petitioner. Basing on the same, police registered a case for the aforesaid offence.
3.
Heard Sri Mohd.Muzafferullah Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused and Sri D.Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the respondent-State.
4.
The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioner is innocent of the offence alleged against him; that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 07.04.2026;
that the victim already discharged from the hospital 05.04.2026; that entire investigation is completed, further interrogation of the petitioner is not required and hence he prays this Court to grant regular bail to the petitioner.
5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the same and submits that the offence alleged against the petitioner is grievous in nature ; that the victim sustained head injury and other bleeding injuries and he was admitted in the hospital. That apart the petitioner herein involved in other four crimes of similar nature and therefore, he is not entitled for grant of bail and hence, he prays to dismiss the petition. However, as on today, no charge sheet is filed.
6.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for both parties and perusal of the material on record, the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 07.04.2026. As seen from the record, L.Ws.1 to 14 were examined including the Investigating Officers. Though there is past history against the petitioner that four crimes were registered, he has been in judicial custody since 07.04.2026, no charge sheet is filed as on today, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner/Accused subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner-accused shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned
Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Excise and Prohibitions), Sangareddy.
(ii) On such release, the petitioner-accused shall appear before the concerned S.H.O. between 09:00 a.m., and 5:00 p.m., on every Wednesday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.
(iii) The petitioner-accused shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437 (3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480 (3) of BNSS). 7.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 17.06.2026 YVL