← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/12527/2015disposed of no costs

K.Uleppareddy, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2015-06-02A Ramalingeswara Rao2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.12527 of 2015 ORDER:

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

The petitioner states that he is a local resident of Uddehal Village, Bommanahal Mandal, Anantapur District. He was appointed as a fair price shop dealer by the second respondent after following due process of law. The authorization issued to the petitioner is valid up to 31.03.2016. While so, the third respondent submitted a letter to the second respondent on 11.03.2015 stating that the petitioner committed some irregularities. Based on the said report, the second respondent issued a show cause - cum - suspension order on 20.03.2015 directing the petitioner to submit his explanation, and also suspended the dealership of the petitioner, pending enquiry. The petitioner submitted his explanation on 29.03.2015.

Challenging the action of the second respondent in suspending the authorization of the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is filed. Since the impugned order is only an order of suspension pending further enquiry, and the petitioner has already submitted his explanation, this Writ Petition cannot be kept pending. The second respondent is, accordingly, directed to conduct the enquiry in accordance with law, within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and pass final orders on the allegations alleged against the petitioner. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

(A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J) 02.06.2015 vs