Mumtaz Yaruddowla Wakf And 2 Others, v. The Govt. Of A.P., Rep By Prl.Sec And Another,
[ 3303 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3276 OF 2011 Between:
1. Mumtaz Yaruddowla Wakt, 16-2-737, Malakpet, rep by its Secretary Arlr. Mahboob Alam Khan
2. Mumtaz College of Engineering & Technology, Malakpet, repby its Secretary and Correspondent Mr. Mahboob AIam Khan
3. Mahboob Alam Khan, S/o. Shah Alam Khan, Business, Rl/o. Rahat Kada, Barkatpura, Hyderabad ...PETITIONERS AND 1 . The Govt. of A.P., Principal Secretary, Minority Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad
2. Principal Secretary, Minority Welfare Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction one more in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus" declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not granting religious minority status to the 2nd petitioner institution for a period of three years as being illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional apart from being in violation of G.O.tt/ls. No.1 dated 16.01.2OO4 and consequentially direct the Respondent to grant minority status for a period of three years and permanent minority status thereafter to the 2nd petitioner institution l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP.
NO: 4062 OF 20'11) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith consider and pass orders on the petitioners' representation dated 29.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFA,RE The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENfVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.3276 of 2OLL ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. Anjali, learned counsel representing Sri S. Niranjan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
In view of the above submission, the writ petition 1S dismissed as infructuous.
I Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SD/.N. SRIHARI ASSTSTANTIbGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To'1. One CC to SRI S. NIRANJAN REDDYJdvo.cate^[OPUCI . i. i;; dd.i.-oi Fon SociAl wELFARE, High court for the state ot Telangana. [OUT]
3. Two CD CoPies BN SW\ v
HIGH COURT DATED:2110212023 ( j :-- .$ s + l'
I 9'// ,/
ORDER
WP.No.3276 of 2011 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS "t'"i s ot Is 23