Miriyala Murali v. The State Of Telangana

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY, IHE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETI TION NO: 7941 OF 2024 Between:

1. Miriyala Murali, S/o. Chandramouli Age{ . Q8 yrs, Occ.. Stationary.shop Business R/o. Flat No 40B, Swathinivas Residenby Road No.1. New Nagole Colony Hyderabad - 500035.

2. Pisike Praveen, S/o. Suresh Aged . 36 yrs, Occ. Software Employee R/o Plot No. 1 13, lndira Nilayam Chandeeshwar Colony, LB Nagar Ranga Reddy Dlstrict - 500070.

...Petitioner/Accused No.1 & 2

AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of for the State of Telangana, At Hyderabad.

2. Ravirala Ramesh. s/o Ganesh Age.45 yrs, """. ;r:"t=::ffI,]uo,;ffi:

Chandur, Nalgonda District.

... Respondents/De-facto Complainant Petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in crime No.16/2024 on the file of PS Chandur, Nalgonda District against the petitioners i accused No1 and 2. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under section 482 of cr.P .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandurn of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appurtenance of the of the petitioner in Crime No '16/2024 on the file of PS Chandur, Nalgonda District.

/ This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crrminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Yadu Krishna Sainath, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Addl. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the, following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JT'STICE JTIVVADI SRIDE\/I CRIMINAL PETITION No.7941 of 2024 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that during the pendency of the criminal petition to quash the FIR, charge sheet has been filed ald hence, the matter has become infructuous.

Recording tl-re aforesaid submission, this criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to petitioner(s) to challenge the charge sheet, if desires so.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/- T. JAYASREE ASSI T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY'

CTION OFFICER To, .1 . The Judicial First class Magistrate, (special Mobile court), at Nalgonda. 2- The Station House Officer' Chandur' Nalgonda District'

3. One CC to Sri. V Yadu Krishna Sainath' Advocate [OPUC]'

4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor' High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies YIR/gh

t HIGH COURT DATED:1 811212024 ,,a:---- l;t- s:TA ( CRLP.No.7941 of 2024 i1 ?sls Is k I lr v $ ttB

ORDER

t e!

ci\ DESP,\1 DISMISSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTI.'OUS.

@"'Pi4 W