Evelyl Rajasree v. Smt Pidakala Nissy And Another

HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.2810 OF 2014 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, who is no other than respondent No.2 in D.V.C.No.2 of 2014 on the file of the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, outcome of the complaint by the 1st respondent. In fact, as laid down by this Court in Gaddameedi Nagamani v. The St at e of Telangana rep. by Public Prosecut or (Crl.P (SR) Nos.22371 of 2015 and batch), there is an efficacious appeal remedy under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act, to impugn the cognizance. Hence, there is nothing to entertain the quash petition but for giving liberty to file appeal if at all within one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order before the Court of Sessions and in such an event, the learned Sessions Judge shall entertain the appeal without regard to period of limitation for appeal.

The petitioner is further at liberty to file an application under Rule 37 of the Criminal Rules of Practice for one to represent others or Section 205 Cr.P.C. to represent through special vakalat holder and the learned Magistrate to hear and pass orders by considering the same with necessary conditions. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. B.