← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/10532/2004dismissed as infructuous

Ms.Ch.Krishnaveni v. Gaetec-Sitar

2021-11-15T.Madhavi Devi3 pages

HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.10532 OF 2004 ORDER:

Ms. G. Sudha, learned standing counsel for respondent No.2, submits that the respondent organisations are no longer in existence and the petitioner being a contract labourer may not have been in their service.

2.

In view of the above submission of learned standing counsel for respondent No.2, it appears that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

3.

Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with the liberty to the petitioner to seek recall of this order, if the above submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is found to be incorrect. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. _______________________ P. MADHAVI DEVI, J Date:15.11.2021 KH

- 2 - HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.10532 OF 2004 Date:15.11.2021 KH

- 3 -