N.Narayana Reddy v. The State Of Telangana
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN :PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRLP .NO:7381 of 2015 Between:
1 N.Narayana S/o. Kannaiah 2 N.Kotaiah, S/o. Kannaiah (The names of petitioners No. 1 & 2 are amended as per Court order dated 17-082015 in Crl.P.MP. No. 7967 of 2015 ..... Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 2 AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. through The Station House Officer, KPHB Police Station, Cyberabad District. .....Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition filed herein the High Court may be pleased to direct to enlarge the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.634/2015 of KPHB Police Station, Cyberabad District in the interest of Justice. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu, Advocate for the Petitioners and of Public Prosecutor(TG) for the respondent, the Court made the following.
ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL
CRL.P.No.7381 of 2015 ORDER:
The petitioners, who are A-1 and A-2, in Crime No.634 of 2015 of KPHB Police Station, Cyberabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A I.P.C. and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, moved this application for anticipatory bail. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the marriage between the defacto complainant and the 1st petitioner-A1 was performed on 23.11.2003 and that at the time of marriage, an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and gold ornaments were presented as dowry. It is alleged that after the marriage, the 1st petitioner used to come to house in a drunken condition and harass the defacto complainant as she is not able to give birth to a child and also for additional dowry. It is further alleged that the 2nd petitioner also used to harass the defacto complainant with abusive words.
Record discloses that entire investigation has been completed and that there is no chance for tampering the evidence by the petitioners. The 1st petitioner is a Government employee and the 2nd petitioner is his brother and that they are permanent residents of SPSR Nellore District.
Sd/- P.SREENIVASULU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
1. The II Additional Junior Civil Judge cum XIX Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally,
Miyapur, Cyberabad
2. The Station House Officer, KPHB Police Station, Cyberabad
3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor (TG), High Court at Hyderabad (OUT)
4. One CC to Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu, Advocate (OPUC)
5. One spare copy.
Gk Note: In the order dated 04.08.2015 in Crl.P. No.7381/2015 in the unnumbered Para 3, the word "SPSR Nellore District" and the petitioners name "1. N. Narayana Reddy S/o Kanna Reddy, 2. N. Siva Kota Reddy S/o Kanna Reddy" is substituted for "Ranga Reddy District" and "1. N. Narayana S/o Kannaiah, 2. N . Kotaiah S/o Kannaiah" as per the order of the court dt.17.08.2015 in Crl.P.M.P. No.7967/2015 and this amended order shall be substituted for the earlier order which was dispatched on 06.08.2015. Sd/- R.VENKATA LAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
HIGH COURT MSKJ,J DATED: 04.08.2015 07.08.2015 AMENDED ORDER:
CRLP. NO:7381 of 2015
DIRECTION HIGH COURT GK Dated : 05.08.2015 MSKJ,J DATED: 04.08.2015 ORDER:
CRLP. NO:7381 of 2015 DIRECTION