Begum Collections v. The,State Of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By Its Prinicipal

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Writ Petition No.30703 of 2016 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) Both Ms.N.Niyatha, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri S.Suri Babu, learned Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes, would agree that as the vehicle and the subject goods have been released, albeit after the writ petition was filed, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and that the writ petition has become infructuous.

The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ) _____________________________ (U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J) 17th September 2016 JSU

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Writ Petition No.30703 of 2016 Date: 17.09.2016 JSU