Marri Raji Reddy v. The State Of Telangana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF ]UNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5284 OF 2022 Between:

Marri Raji Reddy, S/o. late-Narayan Reddy, Aged about 64 years, Occ. Agriculture, Resident of H.NO, 6-101, Mannemuthyalamma Kunta village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, R. R, District .....PETrTrONER/A1 AND The State of Telangana, rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

..,,.RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Sectlon 438 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner herein in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime. No. 41412022 on the file of Police Station Hayathnagar, R.R. District This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri AVANCHA H CHAKRAVARTHY ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.

The Court made the following: ORDER I

, THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5284 OF 2022 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 ol Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, who is Accused No.1 in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.4 14 o{ 2022 on the file of Hayathnagar Police Station, Rachakonda, registered for the olfences punishable under Sections 419, 42O, 465, 468,47 1 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code and under section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. 2.

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State. 3.

Since the punishment prescribed for the offences alleged against the petitioner are up to seven years, without going into merits of the matter, respondent - Police are directed to scrupulously follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 41-A Cr.P.C and the guidelines formulated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar a. Sto:te of Blharr scrupulously. It is needless to say, any deviation in this regard will be viewed seriously. 4.

The Criminal Petition is accordingly, disposed off. 5.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this criminal I petition, sha11 stand closed.

sD/ .K.AM MA.] DEPUTY REGIST R I lrRvE coPY I I SECTION FFICER '(2014) s scc 2?3 l To,

1. The Station House Officer, Hayathnagar, Police Station Hayathnagar, R.R. District

2. One CC to SRI AVANCHA H CHAKRAVARTHY Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies

5. One Spare Copy SB

HIGH COURT DATED:27l0612022 1al-4 (.) l!!

.L .$ sCI \ o *

ORDER

CRLP.No.5284 of 2022 DISPOSING OF THE CRLPMINAL PETITION Qtr-