← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/8228/2024dismissed as infructuous

Abdul Raheem v. The State Of Telangana

2024-12-18Juvvadi Sridevi4 pages

13257 1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIOEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8228 OF 2024 Between:

'1 . Abdul Raheem, S/o Mohammed Ahmed, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Business, Rlo 8-2-676/11301N29, Sri Ram Nagar, Road No.12 Banjarahills, Hyderabad.

2. Mohammed Ahmed. Slo I'Iohd Yousuf Ali, Aged about 59 years, Occ. Business Rlo 8-2-676!1130iA129 Sri Ram Nagar, Road No.1 2 Banjarahills, Hyderabad, Petitioner/Accusedl & 2 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature, at Hyderabad. Through SHO, Bhupalpally.

2. Mohammed Saida Begum, D/o Lage Sardar Ali, Aged about 26 years, Occ Housewife, R/o H.No. 2-322. Hanuman Nagar, Main Road, Jayashanker Bhupalpally Dist.

...RespondenUComplainants Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FlR.No. 32 of 2024 on the file of the P.S BHupalpally, Jayashanker Bhupalpally District for the offences u/s 498-4. 506 lPC. 3 6 4 of O.F Rct against the petitioners/Accused No. 1 AND 2 {- l.A. NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest/ appearance of the petitioners/ Accused No. 1 and 2 in pursuance of the FlR.No. 32 of 2024 on lhe file of the P.S BHupalpally, Jayashanker Bhupalpally District, pending disposal of the main Crl.P

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri L RAM SINGH ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and None appeared for the Respondent No 2 The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JIIWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PEfITION No.8228 of 2o24 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that during the pendency of the criminal petition to quash the FIR, charge sheet has been filed and hence, the matter has become infructuous.

Recording the aJoresaid submission, this criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty 1S granted to petitioner(s) to challenge the charge sheet, if desires so.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd,. MOHD. ISMAIL AS sr siXNi'He"c r 3ii{nn r'z /ffRUE COPY/I CTION OFFI CER To, l.TheStationHouseOfficer,BhupalapallyPoliceStation,Jayashankar ? "?ilfss :li'fi',my, s'$fs.

o' ["t8'fi t8'E h' 3]o u rt ot retan s a n a at " r-ruJeiaUra, Advocate [OUTI a. Trfuo CD CoPies SM/gh F\-

HIGH COURT DATED: 1811212024 ttE S14 {, lr iJ >

ORDER

11 rFtl 2U5 CRLP.No.8228 ot 2024 t * sPatcd DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS THE CRIMINAL PETITION w- (fl^,