M/S. Uni Ads Ltd., Rep By Its General Manager, v. The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager,
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION NO: 18987 OF 2008 Between:
i Ii4/s. Uni Ads Ltd., Rep by its General Manager, M. Narayana Raju S/o. Krishnam , Raju having its Office at 7-1-21218 Shiv Bagh, Ameerpet, Hyderabad - 500061. ..,PETITIONER AND The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Secunderabad Division, South Central Railway, Secunderabad.
RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No. C/C/272lADVTS/SC-App/2006 dt. 14-8-2008 issued by the Respondent as illegal, arbitrary void and contrary to the tender conditions and law WPMP. NO: 24755 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings No. ClCl2T2lADVIS/SC-App/2006 dt. 14-8-2008 issued by the respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition WPMP.
NO: 24756 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to handover the places as per Proceedings No. C/C/272|ADVTS/SCApp/2006 dt. 3'1-10-2007 and Tender Notification No. ClCl2T2lADVTSISC-APP/2006 dt. 2-9-2006 by entering into agreement with the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. V. N. NARASIMHAM (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for Respondent: SRI R. V.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI \\'.P.No.18987 OF 2008 ORDE It In spite of the matter being listed under the caption ('for dismissal", none appears and no representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. SDIN.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One
2. One
3. Two MBC CC to Sri V V N Narasimham Advocate [OPUC] CC to Sri R V Narasimha Raju Advocate [OPUC] CD Copies
HIGH COURT DATED: 1510212021 s .?
o z 202r t4Ail Z o I t .!i* I
ORDER
i WP.No.18987 of 2008 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS