Boston Industrial Training Centre, v. The Director Of Employment And Training,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 21041 OF 2015 ORDER:

1.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2.

The prayer sought in the Writ Petition is as under: " ....to issue an writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents not allotting the students in the previous year and not taking steps to empanel the name of the petitioner in the counselling list as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and violative of Art 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the counselling and allot students and also allow the petitioner to fill the left over seats from the open market as per the admission schedule."

3.

Respondent No.2 filed a counter affidavit stating that District Convenor/ Principal, Government I.T.I (Girls), Nalgonda visited the area near survey of India, Bhongir, Nalgonda district on 18.8.2015. On verification, he found the name board of the petitioner institution which is fixed to a Tin shed of size 100 ft X 50 ft. The shed was locked. One more name board with a direction arrow was placed on the main road near Bharath Petroleum Bunk which is about 400 meters from Railway Station, Bhongir. On enquiry, it was found that the Tin Shed was locked since a long period. It is further stated in the counter affidavit that the petitioner institution neither had any board nor institution was existing at the time of filing of the Writ petition. However, after observing the orders of this Court, the petitioner has fixed a name board, direction board and opened the lock of the premises. Therefore, the petitioner has misled this Court. It is also stated in the counter affidavit that the petitioner institution is not having valid affiliation orders and not having any

infrastructure. Even if the candidates are allowed to take admission into the institution, they will not get full fledged training and they would become burden to the Nation.

4.

Though a detailed counter affidavit with specific averments is filed as mentioned supra, no reply affidavit is filed rebutting the said averments.

5.

In those circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that there are no merits in the Writ Petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

6.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

__________________ P. KESHAVA RAO,J Date: 30.11.2018 KPM