R.R. Caterers, Hyderabad v. Airports Authority Of India, Hyd And Another

[ 32ss ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:6030 OF 2008 Between:

R.R. Caterers, Hyderabad, Rep by its Proprietor, KV Raghava Reddy, S/o. Ram Eathi Reddy, aged 48 years, Occ : Business. Ryo. H.No'. 1-1287 l33,Bapu Nagar, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. AND ...PET|T|ONER

1. Airports Authority Of lndia, Hyd, Hyderabad Airport, Rep by its Director, Begumpet Airport, Begurnpet, Hyderabad.

2. AirportsAuthority of lndia, Rep by its Chairman, Corporate Office : Rajiv Gandhi Bhavan, New Delhi - 1 10 003.

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the demand notice No. AAI/HYD/COMMU481/20O5-O6 dt. 14-8{006 and the final orders passed by the 1st respondent vide their orders No. 14-8-2006 and the final orders passed by the 1 st respondent vide their orders NO. AA1/HYD/COML/ST/2006 dt. t 4-9-2006 are illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional l.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(WP MP. NO: 7839 OF 2008) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim stay of recovery of arrears of Rs.

2,6O,528/- and further proceedings in pursuance of order AAI/HYD/COMMU48112005-06 dt. 14-8-2006 and the final orders passed by the 1st respondent vide their orders No. AA 1 /H yD/co M L/sr/2006 oli11;%_r#9,, c fty At$ R.4 Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. CH. SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.l&2: SRI.E.

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHTIYAN AND THE HOI{'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6O3O of 2OO8 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhilgan) Heard Mr. Satyanarayana, learned counsel rePresenting Mr. Ch.Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. E.Madan Mohan Rao, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. It is submitted at the Bar that the writ petition has become infructuous.

3.

In view of above, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 4.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

SD/- N.SRIHARI ASsrsrANr ff"nTin"

SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 2 3ffi 3313='51,"!,^'JK1'33i-ii3TiE,t"oj"Y"%'u"l Two CD coPies B IVI r/sw

HIGH COURT DATED:1211212022 " --- ::::=:-.\ :: ii ,\ (J ),aO.

[ 1 'tuu ?t#l ;t.

I .':l'>

ORDER

WP.No.6030 of 2008 I I I DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS , SN zzf 1.f ,--