Mamilla Sai Geetha v. The State Of Telangana
[ 32e6 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER ]WO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITIO N NO: 20675 OF 2023 Between:
Mamilla Sai Geetha, S/o Venkateshwarlu, Age 25 years, Occ 843/8/N, Balaji Hills Colony, Boduppal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District. Student, R/o .....PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Rep. by its principal Secretary, Home Department.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda, Malkajgiri, Medchal_Malkajgiri District.
3. The Station House Officer, Nacharam police Station, Medchal_tvlalkajgiri District.
.....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of india praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or orders more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 to file final report in Cr.No.5212023, dated 2810112023 are arbitrary, illegal, viotates the principles of natural justice and against the Article 14 of the constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 herein against the petitioner. |.A.NO:1 OF 2023 Petition Under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou( may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.3 file a Final Report Or Charge Sheet after closing this matter the pendency of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAJESH BABU, ADVOCATE FOR SRI RAVI KUMAR GADIPE Counsel for the Respondents : AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER
HON'BLE SRI WSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITIOIt Ito.2O675 of2o23 ORDER:
Mr.Rajesh Babu, learned proxy counsel representing Sri G.Ravi Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the relief sought in the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition IS dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT BEGISTRAR /TTRUE COPY// u, SECTION OFFICER To
1. Two CCs to GP For Home, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
2. One CC to Sri Ravi Kumar Gadipe, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD Copies SA GJ s
HIGH COURT DATED:2211212023 T s AI e e'
t\ o q ( 5oo
ORDER
19 Jrl'I 2tr1[ fr WP.No.20675 of 2023 * PA * D c { s DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS @'c4;$ €;ro,--'
6ilP-