Narsing Ravi, v. The State Of Telangana.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.35235 of 2016 ORDER:

The petitioner complains against inaction in disposing of representation dated 10-10-2016 in the light of 3rd respondent's report dated 28-09-2015.

I have perused the representation, dated 10-10-2016. This Court prima facie is of the view that the report of 3rd respondent is dated 28-09-2015, the 2nd respondent ought to have taken a decision on the said report within a reasonable time. Since no decision is taken, as stated in the affidavit, I am satisfied the writ petition can be disposed of by this order without going into the merits of the writ petition.

The 2nd respondent considers and disposes of representation dated 10-10-2016, keeping in view the report dated 28-09-2015, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to observe that respondents 4 to 6 are also heard in the enquiry if the 2nd respondent proposes to conduct in this behalf and pass appropriate orders. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed. _____________ S. V. BHATT, J Dt: 19-10-2016 Prv