M/S. Superman Personal Care Pvt Ltd v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (Ct)/ Appellate Joint Commissioner (St) And 2 Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 32s51 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA"
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY wRlT PETITION NO: 22979 OF 2020 Between:
lt/l/s. Superman Personal Care Pvt Ltd., No. 2, Jeedimetla Road, Phase 'l , IDA Jeedimetla, Chinthal, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad, Telangana 500055 Represented by its Authorized Signatory Madhavi Mudda, D/o. T Rammohan Rao, Aged about 50 years, R/o Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER AND '1 . Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT)/ Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST), Hyderabad Rural Division.
2. Commercial Tax Officer, IDA Gandhinagar Circle, Hyderabad.
3. State of Telangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ. direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No.20833 dated 31-03-2018 passed by the Respondent No. 2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No. 1214 dated 29-06-2020 passed by the Respondent No. 1 as being void, illegal, violative of Article 265and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution of lndia, totally without jurisdiction and violative of the principles of natural justice. I lA NO: 't OF 2O2O Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated an the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay
all further proceedings and consequential actions pursuant to the assessment order A.O.No.20B33 dated 31-03-2018 passed by the Respondent No. 2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No. 12'14 dated 29-06-2020 passed by the Respondent No- 1.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.NAGA DEEPAK Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K.RAJI REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHIIYAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22979 of 2O2O ORDER: (Per the Hoft'ble the Chief Justice Lljjal Bhugan) Heard Mr. M.Naga Deepak, learned counsel for the Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.Raji respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme introduced by the Government of Telangana, petitioner has settled the tax dispute wit"lr the State. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw the writ petition.
3.
In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. However, there shail be no order as to costs. I I SD/. T, JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// secrlb'Jhbrrrcen To,
1. One CC to SRI M.NAGA DEEPAK, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI K.RAJt REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl
3. Two CD Copies PSK.
KKS Bse.
I
HIGH COURT DATED:3011212022 '{ $E ST4I{- qd rE rEBzCIn ..:
ORDER
WP.No.22979 of 2020 t, ' t.- .-," tl'
*.:*._l|!i?'
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION ON WITHDRAWAL WITHOUT COSTS.
2^'
6?- ",rV