Pachipulusu Venkata. Subbarao, S/O.Venkateswarlu, v. State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SEVENTEEN

Present

WRIT PETITION No.31025 of 2017 Between:

Pachipulusu Venkata Subbarao, S/o. Venkateswarlu, Aged 70 years, Occ: Business R/o. H.No.59, MGH Colony, Gandhi Nagar Grampanchayat, Chirala Mandal, Prakasham District.

.. Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, A.P.Secretariat, Amaravathi, Velagapudi, Guntur District and 5 others .. Respondents The Court made the following:

WRIT PETITION No.31025 of 2017 ORDER:

Heard.

2.

Petitioner is aggrieved by notification of property to an extent of Ac.3.75 cents in Sy.No.225/1A of Chirala Revenue Village in the prohibited list of properties under Section 22A(1)(e) of Registration Act, 1908. Aggrieved by the said notification, petitioner preferred an application to the committee constituted by the Government under G.O.Ms.No.300, Revenue (Assn.I), dated 05.07.2016. Alleging in action in disposing of the application filed by the petitioner, this writ petition is filed.

3.

Since petitioner has already availed the remedy of filing application before the committee constituted by the Government, in accordance with the direction of Full Bench of this Court in "Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary Vs State of Andhra Pradesh1", this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition and keep the same pending.

4.

This writ petition is disposed of directing the committee to examine the claim of the petitioner as ventilated in his representation dated 08.08.2016 and take appropriate decision as warranted by law and communicate the decision 1 2016 (1) ALT (550) (F.B)

to the petitioner. It is needless to observe, as held by the Full Bench of this Court, that once a decision is made by the committee, it is binding on the petitioner as well as the Government and the aggrieved party has to work out the remedies as available under law. The entire exercise shall be done within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5.

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

6.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this petition shall stand close.

____________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 14.09.2017 dv

WRIT PETITION No.31053 of 2017 Date:14.09.2017 dv