High Court for State of TelanganaWP/30063/2011closed no costs

Linga Udaykumar, v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh,

2015-08-17C.Praveen Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * * W.P. No.30063 of 2011 Between:

Linga Udaykumar .. Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & 4 others .. Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 17-08-2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgment?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals

3. Whether Their Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment? Yes/No THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.30063 of 2011 ORDER:

In spite of the matter being posted under the caption "for dismissal", there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The present writ petition is filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 in considering the applications of the petitioner dated 22.08.2011 and 02.11.2011, for implementation of the name of the petitioner in revenue

records in respect of Sy.No.1309 to an extent of 133.33 Sq.yds and Sy.No.1536 to an extent of 203.68 Sq.yds situated at Koratla Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to implement the name of the petitioner in concerned revenue records in pursuance of mutation Proceedings file No.B/552/2005 dated 20.03.2006 in respect of Sy.No.1309 to an extent of 133.33 Sq.yds and Sy.No.1536 to an extent of 203.68 Sq.yds situated at Koratla Village, Karimnagar District. The Government Pleader for Revenue submits that the respondents have already considered the representations made by the petitioner and the name of the petitioner was entered in the revenue records. In view of the submission made by the Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court is of the view that nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication and the same is accordingly closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

_________________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR 17.08.2015 knl THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.30063 of 2011

Date: 17.08.2015 knl