Shaik Mahaboob Bee v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT W.P.No.12792 OF 2016 ORDER:

The petitioner prays for the following relief: "....this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent No.3 in threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his lawful possession in respect of the land to an extent of Ac.1.38 gts. and Ac. 3.55 gts., in Sy.Nos.182/1 and 183/1 situated at Kanigiri village and Mandal, Prakasam District, without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Article 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the above said land and to pass such ....."

On 19.04.2016, this Court granted interim direction as prayed for and the interim order is subsisting as on date. According to the petitioner, interfering with her possession or enjoyment is illegal and unconstitutional.

In spite of granting sufficient time, the respondents have not filed counter affidavit or sent instructions in the matter or pointed out any reason to deviate from the interim order dated 19.04.2016. Hence, without expressing any view on merits, the interim order is made final order and the respondents are directed not to interfere with the possession or enjoyment of the petitioner, except in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.

____________ S.V.BHATT, J 27th June, 2017 Lrkm