Sadaraboyina Heeralal v. Sadaraboyina Nageswaramma

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY I.A.No.3 of 2018 In/And SECOND APPEAL No.506 of 2012 JUDGMENT:

This appeal is filed assailing the judgment and decree dated 19.11.2011 in A.S.No.87 of 2004 on the file of VIII Additional District Court (Fast Track), Vijayawada, wherein whereby the decree and judgment dated 16.07.2004 in O.S.No.404 of 1996 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge Court, Vijayawada, decreeing the suit filed by the plaintiffs for declaration and partition of the plaint schedule property, was confirmed.

2.

I.A.No.3 of 2018 is filed by the petitioners-appellants seeking to pass decree in the appeal in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

3.

Appellants 2, 3 and 4 are present. Sri K.Sitaram, learned counsel identified the appellants. Respondents 1 to 3 are present. Sri Ghantasala Udaya Bhaskar, learned counsel identified the respondents.

4.

Appellants 2, 3 and 4 and respondents 1 to 3 in open Court submitted that they entered into a compromise in the interest of both families so as to put an end to the litigation. This Court explained the terms and conditions of the compromise deed in Telugu to the parties. The appellants and the respondents admitted that the recitals in compromise deed are true and correct. 5.

In view of the submission made by both the counsel and also in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, I.A.No.3

of 2018 is ordered and the second appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise. Registry is directed to append the memo of compromise to the decree copy. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J 16.11.2018 Rns