J.Sridhar Babu, v. The Apgenco

13257 1 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 1159 OF 2013 Between:

J.Sridhar Babu, S/o: Yadi Rao, aged 39 years, R/o. H.No.1 - l -18713/1 7, Vivek Nagar, Chikkadapally, Hyderabad.

.,.PETITIONER AND The APGENCO, rep. by its Managing Director, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. The Chief General Manager (ADM), APGENCO, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned action of respondents in not appointing the petitioner in the post of Trainee Sub Engineer(Mechanical) meant for SC(General) notified in Notification No. 4/CGM(ADMy2010, dt.3-1-201 l and further action of respondents in keeping several notified post vacant inspite of availability of candidates on merit like the petitioner as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 1 6 of Constitution of India.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 140'l OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for appointment in the existing vacancy of post of Trainee Sub-Engineer notified in Notification No. 4/CGM(ADMy2010, dt.3-1-2011 pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondents: V UMA DEVI The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JTIWADI SRIDEVI WRIT PETITION No.1159 of 2OL3 ORDER:

Petitioner in this u,rit petition has questioned the action ol respondents in not appointing the petitioner as Trainee Sub Engineer (Mechanical) 2.

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that vide proceedings dated'29.O7.20 17, petitioner has been appointed as Artisan Grade-1. and hence, no further orders are necessary in the u,rit petition and the same may be closed. Counsel for petitioner does not dispute the same. 3.

Taking the said submission on record, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stald closed SO/-P.CH. NAGABHUSHAM BA ASSTSTANT REcIS/RAR nLl SECTION"OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri G. V. Shivaii. Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to M/s. V. Uma Devi, SC for GENCO[OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies TJ SB /ffRUE COPY//

HIGH COURT DATED:0210112024 -rAT S e t\ 1? rtB 202[ oo r,t ,c

ORDER

S { t DE WP.No.1159 of 2013 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.

l,D)-2F (