← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/6978/2020dismissed as infructuous

Kanugutta Bapu Rao And Another v. State Of Telangana And Another

2021-11-17G Sri Devi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITIO NO: 6978 oF 2020 Between:

1. Kanugutta Bapu Rao, S/o Ramulu,

2. Smt.Kanugutta Bharathi, W/o K.Bapu Rao, ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 AND 3 AND '1. The State of Telangana, through Police Station Saroornagar, WpS, R.R.District, represented by its Public Prosecutor High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

2. D.Satyanara_yq!a .Vu{ty @ D.U.B.V.S.N.tMurthy, S/o D.Malleswara Rao, R/o. H.No. 5-2-1 94/94 SP, Maruthi Nagar, Vanasiatipuram, Hyderabad. RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 482 ol cr.P.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the FIR crime No. 347 of 2020 on the file of the police station, saroornagar, women Police station, Ranga Reddy District registered for the offences punishable Sections 498-A,417,406, 504, 34 of IPC r/w Section 3 and 4 of Dp Act as against the petitioners herein l.A. NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P.

C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings as against the petitioners in FIR No.347t2020 on the file of the Police Station Saroornagar, Women Police Station, Ranga Reddy District registered for the offences punishable Under Sections 498-A, 417,406, SO4, 34 of IPC R/w. Section 3 and 4 of D.P.Act including their personal attendance before the lower court pending the disposal of the above Criminal Petition This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri A.ANANTHSEN REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of the Respondent No.

2 not appeared either in person or by Advocate.

The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITIO NO.6978 0F 2020 / q&LE& Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State / would submit that the cause in this Criminal petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Criminal petition has become infructuous.

In that view of the matter, recording the said submission, the I Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.

Sd/K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY'

\ SECTION OFFICER To IIf"[33i11il,1,,Y"Jl33:Jl?l,Yi3',;'S:,t1'"ii?]3f,1!3"f 5"x"x1,Hyderabad (OUT) :.1[i.",:,r"1'.n#s?t3::s.?;3'i'd#i!T'il:t?X,lif l*"'"nPoricestation' Ranga ReddY District'

5. Two CD CoPies

6. One SPare CoPY Kj

HIGH COURT DATED;17t1112021 T s T€ e I ,t Joo C, s 1*tc2$?1 +, c"'

ORDER

GRLP.No.6978 of 2020 DISMISSING THE CRL.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS.

V lAu