Tottaramudi Surendra, v. The State Of Telangana

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.8896 OF 2026 DATE : 23.06.2026 Between :

Tottaramudi Surendra S/o. T.Manikyala Rao.

...Petitioner/

Accused No.1 And The State of Telangana, Rep.byt its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State, Hyderabad.

... Respondent Complainant

O R D E R

This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioner/Accused No.1 seeking to enlarge him on bail in connection with Crime No.695 of of Madhapur Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. The offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Sections 109 and 115 (2) read with 3 (5) of the BNS Act.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that on 07.05.2026 at 06:00 hours, the de facto complainant

lodged a complaint stating she received a phone call from her mother Shaik Khamarajh and informed that her younger brother Shaik Farid Abbas was assaulted and injured by some persons and was shifted to Legacy Multi Speciality Hospital, Madhapur. Immediately, the de facto complainant went to hospital and came to know that her brother received phone call from his friend asking him to come Rushika Men's Hostel, as such her b rother and his friend went to hostel terrace, where they attacked complainant's brother in view of previous disputes. It is stated that under the influence of alcohol assaulted the brother of the complainant with hands and legs and also stabbed with empty beer bottle causing bleeding injuries. When Sameer tried to step the flight, they also assaulted and due to which he also sustained minor injuries. Both admitted in the hospital for treatment and condition is stable. Hence, she requested the police to take necessary action against the on the complaint. Basing on the same police registered a case for the aforesaid offences. 3.

Heard Sri Surya Balu Mahendra, learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused No.1 and Sri D.Arun

Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the respondent-State.

4.

The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him; that there is no intention to kill the victims and it is a sudden incident; that material part of the investigation is completed, the interrogation of the petitioner is not required; that the victims condition is also stable as they discharged from the hospital and hence, he requested this Court to grant regular bail to the petitioner. 5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the same and submits that the offences alleged against the petitioner are heinous and grievous in nature; that the petitioner herein is accused No.1 and he played vital role in the crime and he stabbed the victims and that investigation is in progress and hence, he prays to dismiss the petition.

6.

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 05.05.2026. As seen from the record, L.Ws.1 to 12 were examined. Considering the allegation against the

petitioner and also the period of incarceration, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner/Accused No.1 subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner-accused No.1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned X Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally. (ii) On such release, the petitioner-accused No.1 shall appear before the concerned S.H.O.

between 09:00 a.m., and 5:00 p.m., on every Wednesday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

(iii) The petitioner-accused No.1 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437 (3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480 (3) of BNSS). 7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 23.06.2026 YVL