← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaAS/597/2006dismissed no costs

Battini Rajaveer v. Indian Bank

2022-09-27P.Sree Sudha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUIT NO: 597 OF 2006 Appeal Under Section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated 0B|'1U20O1 in EA No.357/2000 in EP NO.136/1998 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil judge, Warangal.

Between:

Battini Rajaveer, S/o Veeraiah, Aged 65 years, Occ; Employee FVo H.No.'107-1 03, Girmajipet, Warangal ...APPELLANT (Claim Pettioner) AND i

1. lndian Bank, Warangal Branch, Rep. by its Manager, Warangal.

2. M/s Devulapalli ramesh, Metal Works Per its Prop. Devulapalli Sambaiah S/o Sammaiah,Aged 65 years,Occ: Business Flio H.No.16-7-84, Girmajipet, I, Warangal I (R-2 dismissed for default vide C.O. Dated 13-03-201 5) .,.RESPONDENTS (RespondenUDefendant) Counsel for the Appellant: M/s CHINDAM PRATAP(NoI Present) Counsel forthe Respondent R1: P. SHIV KUMAR The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

-- -- THE HON'BLE SMT, JIISTICE P.SREE SUDHA A.S.No.597 of 2O06 oBD,EBi Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. There was no representation on behalf of t he appellant on 23.08.2022 and 13.09.2022. Even today, though the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal, he has not appeared and pursued' the litigation.

2. Accorrlingll , this Appeal Suit is dismissed for nonprosecutiorl. 'l'ht're shall be no order as to costs.

3. Pending miscelianeous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/. T. SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGISTRAR (b ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Senior Civil judge, Warangal.(with records)

2. One CC to SRI CHTNDAM pRATAp, Advocate tOpUCl

3. One CC to SRl. P SHIV KUMAR. Advocate tOpUCI

4. Two CD Copies VH .l

HIGH COURT DATED: 2710912022 ffiar 11 ttn i$s J

JUDGMENT

AS.No.597 of 2006 I Dismissed the Appeal Suit for Non-Prosecution (D (n y$l'\4