← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/8104/2015closed no costs

Mrs. Qamar Jehan Taleyaver Begum And 5 Others v. S. Ramaswamy And Another

2025-12-30J Sreenivas Rao5 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA // AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No: 81Q4 QE2015 Between:

1. Mrs. Qamar Jehan Taleyaver Begum, WO Nawab Syed Maqqood Ali Khan Late aged about 81 years, housewife, R/o 42-600, Moulali, Ranga Reddy District.

2. Syed Ali lmdad, S/o. Nawab Syed Maqsood Ali Khan Late, aged about 64 y6ars, Business Ft/O 42-600, Moulali, Ranga Reddy District.

3. Mr Syed Hasan lmdad, S/o Nawab Syed Maqsood AN Khan Late. aged about 57 ydars, Business R/o 42-600, Moulali, Ranga Reddy District

4. Mrs Amtuz Zeinab Naieebunnisa, Wo Syed Abbas Ali Khan aged about 55 years, housewife R/0 16-10-27016, Aziz manzil, Malakpet Hyderabad

5. Mrs Amtuz Zebra Khairunnisa Begum, Wo Thaver Ali Hussein, aged about 53 years, housewife R/o 42-600, Moulali, Ranga Reddy District

6. Mr Syed Raza lmdad, S/o. Nawab Syed Maqsood Ali Khan Late aged about 57 ydars, Business R/o 42-600, Moulali, Ranga Redcjy District ... Petitioner/Accused- 1 ,2,5,6,7 ,& I AND

1. S. Ramaswamy, S/o. Venkaiah lale, 3-4212, Nagaram, Cyberabad. ...RespondenUDefacto Complainant

2. The State of Telingana, rep., PP, P S. Malkajgiri, Cyberabad,_High_Court at Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash all further proceedings against land ownersipetitioners in PRC 13 of 2015 on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Malkajgiri. LA. NO: 1OF 201S(CRLPMP, NO:8115 OF 2015) Petition under Section 482 of Cr P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings against landowners/petitioners in PRC No. 13 of 2015 on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri including their appearance.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing :l e Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argum,-'ris of Mr PRASAD RAVANABOINA, Advocate for the Petitioners and Mr M.VlVt: CANANDA REDDY, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Re:; 'ondent No.2 and Mr M. Narayana, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 The Court made the following: ORDER

!!rr!-ErcE!tE -F ;:,.::::::- :::::{ .

-:'

//

IN THE HIGII COURT F'OR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

ATHYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.8104 of 2015 Date:30.12.2025 Between:

Mrs Qamar Jehan Taleyaver Begum and five others

...Petitioners

AND S.Ramaswamy S/o Venkaiah late and another

...Respondents

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri M. Vivekananda Reddy, leamed Additionat Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.2, submitted that the cause in the present criminal petition does not survive, on the ground that during the pendency of this criminal petition, P.R.C. No. 1 3 of 20 I 5 was committed to the learned Principal District and Sesslons Judge; Medchal-Malkajgiri District, and the same was numbered as S.C. No.l33 of 20L6. The petitioners, namely accused Nos. l, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8, filed an application in Crl.M.P.No.63 of 20 l6 seeking discharge in S.C. No.l33 of 2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 304(ii) and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The

learned Sessions Judge dismissed the said applicaticr along with Crl.M.P.Nos.27, 28 and 29 of 2022 by a commor order dated 05.09.2022. Aggrieved by the said order, accused ll rs.l,2, 6, 7 and 8 filed Crl. R.C.No.8 I 0 of 2022. [n view of the san ,e, the cause in the present criminal petition does not survive.

2. The above submission is not dir puted by Sri K. Venumadhav, leamed counsel for the petition: in Crl.R.C. No.810 of 2022.

3.

[n view of the foregoing reasons, the cause ir the present criminal petition does not survive for adjudication. 4.

Accordingty, the criminal petition is'closedPending miscellaneous applications, if any r;hall stand closed Sd/- T ;RINIVASA REDDY ASSII TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFTCER To 1 The X Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Malkajgiri

2. The Station House Officer, Malkajgiri Police Station, Cyll rrabad.

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the S;1 tte of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. One CC to Mr. PRASAD RAVANABOINA, Advocate [Ot) JC] 5 One CC to Mr M NARAYANA, Advocate [OPUCI

6. Two CD Copies b RC'Pl{

HIGH COURT DATED: 3011212025 ( oR rHe s;i t'

-) il r,i r ) , l,16

ORDER

v * *\ CRLP.No.8104 of 2015 .-lr. -^.

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is Clrsed. )t $l,