M/S Lakshmi Constructions, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.14432 of 2014 ORDER:

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 2.

The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under:- "...to pass an Order or a Direction or a Writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the 2nd respondent herein in interfering the possession of the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac.1.34 guntas under Revenue Sub Division No.92/2 part of Sy.No.92 situated at Gachibowli Village, Sherlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District during the pendency of Writ petition WP No.39432/ 2013 on the file of High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad as arbitrary, capricious, illegal, ultravires and against to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent herein not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over his land admeasuring Ac.1.34 guntas under Revenue Sub Division No.92/2 part of Sy.No.92 situated at Gachibowli Village, Sherlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy till the disposal of Writ petition WP No. 39432/2013 pending on the file of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad in the interests of justice ...." 3.

Learned Government Pleader placed on record the written instructions, dated 12.12.2019, issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. 4.

From a perusal of the said written instructions, it is revealed that the allegation made by the petitioners that the 2nd respondent is interfering in the possession of the petitioners' land is false and denied, since the 2nd respondent never interfered in the civil issues of the petitioners at any point of time. It is also further mentioned that already W.P.No.39432 of 2013 was filed in this Court and the same is pending consideration and as such, the 2nd respondent never interfered in the above issue.

5.

In the light of the specific instructions, this Court is of the opinion that there are no merits in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. ___________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J 20th December 2019 mar