Coal Mines Provident Fund Organization, Rep. By Its v. A. Hanumantha Prasad

[ 32es ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY. THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO: 1188 OF 2008 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dt 04-09-2008 in W.P.No 14015 of 2008 on the file of the High Court Between:

1. Coal Mines Provident Fund Organization, rep. by its, Commissioner, Jagjevan Nagar, Dhanbad, Jharkand, 82600'1 .

2. The Regional Commissioner, Coal Mines Provident tund Organization, Regional-Office, Godarvarikhani Karimnagar Dist Andhra Pradesh ...APPELLANT(S) AND A, Hanumantha Prasad, S/o. A Balarama Murthy UDC, Regional Office, Cl/PFO, Kothapet, R.R. District, Hyderabad.

B. Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Late B. Sriram Murthy UDC, Regional Office, CMPFO, Kothapet, R.R. District, Hyderabad

3. P.L. Prasanna Kumar, S/o P. Someswar Rao UDC, Regional Office CMPFO' Kothapet, R.R. District, Hyderabad.

4. K. Narahari Reddy, S/o. K. Yadi Reddy UDC, Regional Office, CMPFO, Kothapet, R.R. District, Hyderabad.

5. M. Prakash, S/o. Late M. Venkata Narsu UDC, Regional Ofice, CMPFO, Kothapet, R.R. District, Hyderabad.

6. M. Laxmi Bai, Wo. M. Ramulu UDC, Regional Office, CMPFO, Kothapet, R.R District, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant(s) : SRl. K ARVIND KUMAR CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL Counsel for the Respondents : SRl. SRINIVAS EMANI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

THE TION'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHIIYAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.1188 of 2OO8 JUDGMENT:

lPer the llot1'ble the (:h;ef Justice u.jjal Bhuya ) Heard Mr. K.Aravind Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the writ appeai has become infructuous.

3.

Accordingly, writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. / SD/-B.SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// sEcTtoN 6rrrcen To,

1. One CC to SRI. K ARVIND KUMAR, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL loPUcl

2. One CC to SRl. SRINIVAS EMANI Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies KAR BS d.

\ HIGH COURT DATED:1211012022 ot'IEl-'i 1', q'

(1 .$"

:, \ill )v il Ct li !

\s'

\

JUDGMENT

WA.No.1188 of 2008 DISMISSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 0,rt x\ LL