Nagalla Sunitha v. The State Of Telangana

[ 3301 ] tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO: 23583 OF 2021 Between:

Nagalla Sunitha, W/o Venkatramulu Aged about 23 years, Occ. Karnatee R/o Haiiianawada, Kosgi Village, Narayanpet Mandal Narayanro",.l,iEfli,Orr* AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayath Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The Sate of Telangana, Rep.by its Commissioner, Department of Panchayath Raj and Rural Development Hyderabad.

3. Tha District Collector (Panchayat Rai Wing), Narayanpet District. Narayanapet.

4. The District Panchayath officer, Narayanpet district, Narayanpet.

5. The Mandal Development Officer, Panchayath Raj, Narayanpet Mandal, Narayanpet district'

...RES'.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 oI lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the petitioner as Kamatee who appointed on compassionate grounds is illegal' arbitrary, contrary to law and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 to regularize the petitioner as Kamatee forthwith.

IA NO:1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5 to regularize the petitioner as Kamatee by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 9-9-2021 Pending disposal of the above Writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. KRISHNAIAH Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI G. NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR MPDO The Court made the following: ORDER

-7 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PBIITION N0.23583 of2O2l ORDER:

Seeking to declare the action of the respondents in not regularizing the services of the petitioner as Kamatee, as illegal and arbitrary, the present Writ petition is filed. 2) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, through Virtual Mode, has stated that due to e{flux of time, the cause in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3) Recording the above made submission, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR &"'

SECTION OFFICER I //TRUE COPY// To

1. One CC to SRI K. KRISHNAIAH, Advocate TOPUCI

2. One CC to SRI G. NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR MPDO [OPUC]

3. Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies BN GJP E\<

HIGH COURT DATED:2411112023 -t T S sLt 1g N8 o a) o

ORDER

+ i a l)F t:1.

WP.No.23583 of 2021 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS