Icrisat Employees Cooperative House Building Society v. The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Sangareddy

The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.8377 of 2011 Dated 18.06.2015 Between:

ICRISAT Employees Cooperative House Building Society Ltd., Patancheru, rep. by its Secretary P.Shambulingam ... Petitioner and The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Sangareddy, Medak District and another.

...Respondents

Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.M.Rajamalla Reddy Counsel for the respondents: GP for Co-operation (TS) The Court made the following:

Order:

At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.

This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside Lr.Rc.No.1930/10-H, dated 14-03-2011, of respondent No.1.

I have heard Mr.M.Rajamalla Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Government Pleader for Co-operation (TS) representing the respondents.

A perusal of the impugned proceeding shows that respondent No.1 has addressed a letter to the Director, HRS, ICRISAT, Patancheru, requesting the latter not to grant permission to the President/Secretary of the petitioner- Society for conduct of the ensuing General Body Meeting scheduled to be held in the month of March, 2011. On a careful consideration of nature of the impugned proceeding, I am of the view that the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed for two reasons viz., (i) That the impugned proceeding is a letter of request addressed by respondent No.1 to the Director, ICRISAT; that no order adverse to the petitioner's interest was passed by the ICRISAT, and that therefore, no cause of action based on the correspondence between respondent No.1 and the ICRISAT has arisen for the petitioner to file this Writ Petition; and (ii) That the impugned letter was addressed in connection with the meeting scheduled to be held in March, 2011 only.

Mr.M.Rajamalla Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the meeting was permitted to be held in the ICRISAT premises and that therefore, the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

For the above reasons, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.10392 of 2011, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) Dt: 18th June, 2015 LUR