Smt. Dhamuloori Renuka v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.11428 of 2015 ORDER:

This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/Accused in Crime No.686 of 2015 of Saroornagar Police Station, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 506 read with 34 IPC.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State.

A perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner is the accused and the second respondent is the de facto complainant in Crime No.686 of 2015. As per the allegations made in the complaint, the petitioner herein gave a cheque to the second respondent for an amount of Rs.3,50,000/-. The second respondent presented the cheque for collection and the same was returned with an endorsement 'insufficient funds'. Whether the petitioner has issued the cheque with an intention to deceive the second respondent is purely a disputed question of fact which will come to light during the course of investigation only. It is needless to say that the court has to take into consideration the allegations made in the complaint while exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

, in order to quash the criminal proceedings at the initial stage of investigation. The court is not justified in embarking upon an enquiry to ascertain the truthfulness, genuineness or otherwise of the allegations made in the complaint. It is a settled principle of law that the inherent power should not be exercised to stifle a legitimate investigation. If the allegations made in the complaint do not constitute the offence much less the offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioner, then this court can quash the proceedings in order to prevent abuse of process of court thereby to secure the ends of justice.

ascertain whether the allegations made in the complaint are patently absurd and inherently improbable thereby to quash the proceedings. The material available on record is prima facie sufficient to investigate into the matter in order to ascertain the truthfulness or otherwise of the allegations made in the complaint.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the principle enunciated in R.P.KAPOOR v. STATE OF PUNJAB, STATE OF HARYANA v. BHAJAN LAL, V.Y.JOSE V STATE OF GURAJAT AND TEEJA DEVI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN, I am of the considered view that this is not a fit case to quash the criminal proceedings at the threshold. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the concerned Station House Officer may be directed not to arrest the petitioner till completion of the investigation.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also in view of the principle enunciated by the Supreme Court in ARNESH KUMAR v. STATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER, the Station House Officer, Saroornagar Police Station, Cyberabad, is hereby directed to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. in Crime No.686 of 2015, so far as the petitioner/Accused is concerned.

With the above direction, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

_____________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J 12.11.2015 Rns