The Depot Manager, v. Rachakonda Narayana And Another,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No. 10403 of 2004 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with I.D.No.34 of 2003 on the file of the 2nd respondent-Labour Court, Godavarikhani, and to quash the award dated 3.11.2003 passed therein by holding it as illegal and arbitrary. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.K. Jaya Prakash Rao, learned Counsel for the 1st respondent.

It has been contended by the petitioner corporation that the 1st respondent workman was appointed as conductor in the year 1981. While so, on 19.6.2000 while the 1st respondent was conducting the bus, the checking officials conducted check and alleged that the 1st respondent indulged in cash and ticket irregularities. His conduct was construed as misconduct and after initiating disciplinary proceedings and after conducting regular enquiry, for the proven misconduct, the disciplinary authority imposed punishment of removal on the 1st respondent vide orders dated 21.09.2002. Challenging the same, the 1st respondent raised an industrial dispute in I.D.No.34 of 2003 on the file of the 2nd respondent - Labour Court. The Labour Court without properly appreciating any of the contentions raised by the corporation, passed an award dated 3.11.2003 setting aside

the order of removal and directing the corporation to reinstate the 1st respondent into service. Aggrieved thereby, the present writ petition is filed.

Learned counsel for the 1st respondent has contended that the Labour Court has rightly passed the award in his favour and, therefore, no interference is called for. This Court, having considered the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties, is of the considered view that when once the Labour Court had exercised the power under Section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, unless and until any illegality or irregularity is pointed out by the learned standing Counsel for the petitioner-Corporation in the award passed by the Labour Court, this Court cannot interfere with the award. There are no merits in the writ petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

__________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J 30th November, 2018 Nn

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI Writ Petition No.10403 of 2004 (dismissed) 30th November, 2018 Nn