S. Narasamma v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.20799 OF 2019 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to declare the inaction of 5th respondent in taking any action against the respondents 6 to 9, as they are liable for punishment under Sections 166, 354, 509 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the acts upon the petitioner with mala fide intention, as illegal and arbitrary with consequential reliefs.

Heard Sri Prudhvi Raj Mudunuri, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents.

When the matter came up for hearing on 30.09.2019, this Court directed the petitioner to file the fair typed copies of statements of various officials, which are in the material papers of the writ petition at page Nos.26 to 31, in relation to enquiry against one Sri M.A. Razzak, wherein a reference has been made to the petitioner, which the petitioner disputes as being not spoken by persons who's statements are recorded, to enable this Court to go through the same.

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner furnished copies of the statements of authorities recorded in the course of enquiry, which are at page Nos.26 to 31 of material papers, along with the neat typed copies of the same.

Relying on the said statements, the learned counsel for the petitioner has put forth the submission that the finding recorded in the enquiry report against the petitioner is not supported by any of the said statements, thus she has made a complaint to the 5th respondent on 10.09.2019 to take appropriate action against respondents 6 to 9. Before going into the merits of the matter, this Court while perusing the copies of the statements, as annexed and the neat typed copies of thereof furnished today, noticed that the petitioner has resorted to editing the contents thereof. Since the petitioner is seeking to invoke the equitable jurisdiction of this High Court, he is required to approach the Court with clean hands. Since the petitioner has resorted to tampering with the material filed before this Court, no indulgence is required to be shown.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ T. VINOD KUMAR, J Date: 08.11.2019 Isn