S.Ravi Kumar v. The Tahasildar, Mandal Revenue Office,
[ 3303 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 16192 OF 2009 Between:
S.Ravi Kumar, S/o.S Venkata Subba Rao Business R/o.H.No.12-48,HUDA Colony Chanda nagar, Hyderabad-AP ...PETITIONER AND
1. The Tahasildar, Mandal Revenue office, Patancheru MaMal, Medak District
2. P. Ramesh Kumar S/o Perraju, Aged about 52 years , R/o 36, Brindavan Colony, Nizampet Road, Kukatpally, Hyderabad
3. P. Krishna Ralendra Kumar S/o Perraju Aged about 49 years , R/o Rep. by its GPA Holder Mr.P.Ramesh Kumar S/o Perraju (RR2&3 are impleaded as per C.O. dated 8161201'l in WPMP 22102120091 ...PETITIONERS/PROPOSED RESPONDENT Nos. 2&3 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondent to survey demarcation and fixing of boundaries in land an extent of Ac.6.00 in survey No.257AA2 situated at Nandigama village, vide registered Patancheru Mandal , Medak District -AP l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP.
NO: 21254 0F 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to survey demarcation and fixing of boundaries in land an extent of Ac 6.00 in survey No.257AA2 situated at Nandigama village, vide registered Patancheru Mandal, Medak District AP pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. MEGHANA REP SRl. P. VENKAT REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENTVAS RAO ItrRIT PETITION No.16 L92 of 2OO9 ORDE R:
When this matter has been taken up for hearing, Ms.Meghana, learned counsel, representing Sri p. Venkat Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the cause in the Writ petition does not survive. Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/.C. PRAVE N KUMAR ASSISTANT R GISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad IOUTI
2. One CC to SRt P Verufnr REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl
3. Two CD Copies BM BS t\\-
HIGH COURT DATED:26 11212023
ORDER
T S A T€ 1rE I WP.No.16192 of 2009 q f I $?
?
o I U I I o * t f oF pA o l,!
.l) +,'
DISMISSINGTHEWRITPETITIoNASINFRUGToUS WITHOUT COSTS {z\ q*r