Smt. G. Sulochana v. Apsrtc., Rep Bychairman Musheerabad And 2 Others

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 15448 OF 2007 Between:

Parmareddy, Conductor (E. 209123), APSRTC, Smt. G. Sulochana, D/o G Pargi Depot, R.R. District.

...PETITIONER AND

1. APSRTC., Rep. by Chairman, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

2. The Regional manager/RR lBS, APSRTC., Hyderabad./

3. The Depot l\.4anager, APSRTC, Vikarabad Depot, R.R. District ...RESPONOENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to participate in the examination to be conducted for filling-ip of the post of junior Assistant (P&F) as per notification No.E2l255(4)/07-HZ dated 12-1-07 and 4-5-2007 and consider the petitioner's candidature for the appointment for the post of Junior Assistant (P&F). WPMP. NO: 19531 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to appear of the forthcoming examination for filling-up of the post of Junior Assistant (P&F) Schooled to be held on 22-07 -2007 at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the W.P.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. SIVANANDA KUMAR Counsel for Respondents: SRI N. VASUDEVA REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC The Court made the following: ORDER

-2HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.15448 OF 2OOz ORDER:

There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 25.O2.2O2O. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 03.03.2020, "for dismissal". Today also there is no representation for the petitioner, inspite of the matter being listed under the caption "for dismissal".

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- V SUDHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC

2. One CC

3. Two CD MBC to Sri [Vl. Sivananda Kumar Advocate IOPUCI to Sri N. Vasudeva Reddy. SC FOR TSRTC [OpUCl Copies

HIGH COURT PNR,J DATED: 1110312020 { HE S?A 15 f,'\ .>.

zo.

;:'/ \ 0 t l.lAY it20 - -.. -r. :X!:2C

ORDER

WP.No.15448 of 2007 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION (pe,$ FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS ,19