P. Suresh Kumar And Another v. Government Of India
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEN/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T, VINOD KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7132 OF 2020 Between:
1. P. Suresh Kumar, S/o. P. Hanumanthu, Aged aboul 44 years, Occ. Service, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
2. tt/ohammed zakir Usman, S/o. Late ,"rr;;:'t:;::l;"Ti:l Occupation. Business, No 13-3-4311 , Farhat Manzil, [t/ustaidpura, Hyderabad ..Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2 AND Government of India, Enforcement Directorate, represented by its Joint Director, lll Floor, Shaker Bhavan, Fateh Maidan Road, Hyderabad (through Public Prosecutor, High Courl for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad) ... Res po nde nUCom pla in a nt Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the IVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash ECIR No EClRlHYZOl2l /2019, registered by the Respondent u/s 4 of the Prevention of [,4oney Laundering Acl, 2002, on the basis of FIR No 367 of 2019, PS Worli, l\,4umbai u/s 406, 420,465,468,471, 120-B lPC, which was referred to EOW, It4umbai and numbered as CR No 82 ot 2019, on the touchstone of guidelines 1, 5 and 7 of State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335, to prevent abuse of the process and secure the ends of justice.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the [\,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in ECIR and restraining the Respondent from taking any coercive action, whatsoever, in ECIRI HYZO|2112019, on the file of the Respondent for the alleged offences under the Prevention of lVoney Laundering Act, 2002 lo prevent abuse of the process and secure the ends of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the [\,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri H. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI ]USTICE T.VINOD KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.7132 Of 2020
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners expresses desire not to pursue the criminal petition and accordingly, seeks permission of the Cout to withdraw criminal petition filed.
According permission as sought for, the criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in the light of this final order. SD/. K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR & //TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER To, l.TheJointDirector,EnforcementDirectorate,Governmentoflndia,Hyderabad Zonal Office, HYderabad,
2. One CC to Sri H. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate TOPUC! ,. i;; CCs to the public prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
4. Two CD CoPies
HIGH COURT TVKJ DATED:3011212020 T (
ORDER
o II ,l,t/- rI) CRLP.No.7132 of 2020 (nIz ?0u :(- o * I DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS WITHDRAWN b tt Tb),|