Sri. Shaik Chand v. K. Raghunandan
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY SECOND APPEAL NO: 708 OF 2016 Appeal under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and decree dated 0110612016 made in AS No.14 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the I Additional District Judge, at Mahabubnagar preferred against the Judgment and decree in OS No.132 of 2007 dated 0610612014 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC) at Mahabubnagar.
Between:
Shaik Chand, S/o Abdul Raheem, AND ...APPELLANT '1 . K.
2. K.
Raghunandan, S/o K. Narayana, Sridhar, S/o K. Raghuramulu ...RESPONDENTS For the Appellant : SRI MIRZA NISAR AHMED BAIG, Advocate For the Respondents : SRI HARENDER PERSHAD, Advocate The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A"VENKATESHqIARA REDDY SBCOND APPEAL No.7O8 OF 2016 JUDGMENT:
Heard learned counsel for the appellant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that in a suit for specific performance in O.S.No. 132 of 2OO7 and in A.S.No.74 of 2Ol4 the suit and appeal were dismissed. However, during the pendency of this second appeal, the parties have entered into a compromise and there was a settlement out of Court and no further orders are required in this ser:ond appeal. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this second appeal is dismissed before admission. In the circumstances of the case, the parties shall bear their respective costs. Miscellaaeous petitions, if any, pending, in this second appeal, shall stand \i closed.
Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR /ffRUE COPY// il1 \ sECf I I ION OF ICER To 1.
2.
The lAdditional District Judge, at l\/ahabubnagar. The ll Additional Senior Civil Judge, (FTC) at Mahabubnagar. One CC to Sri Mirza Nisar Ahmed Baig Nizami, Advocate (OPUC) One CC to Sri Harender Pershad, Advocate (OPUC) Two CD Copies One Spare Copy 5.
6.
Kj
HIGH GOURT DATED:.1110412O22 _1 /-'
' t\tj- 'i r ./{ I 11 [tr 2[22
JUDGMENT
SA.No.708 of 2016 DISMISSED.
IA