Dheeravath Watchya v. The Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj,

\ [ 3208 I ,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUIT No: 681 OF 200s Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree Dated 1O-O2-2OO5 made in O.S. No. 56 of 2000 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Miryalaguda.

Between:

1. Dheeravath Watchya, S/o. Danja, aged 55 years, Occ: Agriculturist

2. Dheeravath Patchya, S/o. Danja, aged 50 years, Occ: Agriculturist

3. Dheeravath Rediya, S/o. Danja, aged 35 years, Occ: Agriculturist

4. Dheeravath Ramji, S/o. Danja, aged 30 years, Occ: Agriculturist All are R/o. Kalwapally Village, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District. ...APPELLANTS/PLAtNTt FFS AND

1. The Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj,, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District.

2. The District Panchayath Officer, Nalgonda.,

3. The District Collector, Nalgonda.

RESPONDENTS/DEFE NDANTS Counsel for the Appellants: SRI D. VENKAIAH GOUD (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA A.S.No.681 of 2OO5

JUDGMENT

When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellants.

On 3O.11 .2022, there is no representation for the appellant and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today also, there is no representation for the appellants. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that the appellants are not interested to pursue the litigation.

Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO JQINT REGISTRAR \ /TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge, at Miryalaguda.

2. One CC to SRl. D. VENKAIAH GOUD, Advocate TOPUCI

3. Two CD Copies "strkam VH

,,, / HIGH COURT PSS, J DATED: 19/1 212022 -ri{E S 1 1 APn 20Ul z C() _t.r

JUDGMENT

* * i ,..

AS.No.681 of 2005 THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSEGUTION ),3