Smt.D.Kavitha v. The State Of A.P

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1244 of 2017 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Andhra Pradesh on behalf of the respondent.

In fact, there cannot be any grievance for the petitioners concerning the time granted to them under the order, dated 18.04.2016, in Crl.M.P.No.692 of 2016 in Crime No.91 of 2013 of Renigunta Police Station, passed by the V Additional District & Sessions Judge, Full Additional Charge of X Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tirupati. The petitioners herein, who are arraigned as Accused Nos.5,6,7 and 9 in the above crime, are seeking the relief under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to extend the time granted to them under the aforesaid order dated 18.04.2016, whereby and whereunder while allowing the petition filed for anticipatory bail, the petitioners were directed to surrender before the V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati, on or before 18.05.

2016 and, on such surrender, it was directed that they shall be enlarged on bail on their executing bond for Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati.

granted under the order dated 18.04.2016. Virtually, no grievance would arise against the impugned order. So far as extension of time is concerned, it is open to the petitioners to approach the very same Court, which granted anticipatory bail, by filing an appropriate petition with sufficient reasons and, on filing such petition, the Court may dispose of the same in accordance with law.

With the above observations, the Criminal Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission itself.

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed.

___________________________ A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J 14th February, 2017 v v