N.Dayakar v. T. Hanmanth Rao

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER MACMA.No. 887 of 2007 JUDGMENT:

This appeal is filed by the appellant/ claimant dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Adilabad in O.P.No.194 of 2004, dated 19.01.2007. 2.

Heard both sides and perused the record.

3.

This appeal is filed to enhance the compensation for the injuries suffered by the appellant in a motor accident. There is no much dispute with regard to the rashness and negligence on the part of the crime vehicle. There is also no dispute with regard to the insurance of the vehicle with the Respondent-Insurance Company.

4.

The learned counsel for the appellant contended that the appellant has suffered four injuries in total, out of which three injuries are simple, and one is grievous in nature, i.e., fracture injury on the right temporal region. It is further contended that the Tribunal had granted only Rs.5,000/ - towards the medical expenses, ignoring the medical bills filed to a tune of Rs.26,027/ -. 5.

As seen from the evidence on record, the medical bills filed before the Tribunal are not supported by the prescriptions. The Tribunal had elaborately discussed all the issues and granted a compensation of Rs.30,000/ - in all, which is quite reasonable and

just. Hence, in the circumstances of the case, there is no need to interfere with the order under appeal.

6.

In view of the above, there are no merits in the appeal, and as such the appeal is dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ (DR. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J) July 14, 2017 Kv

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER MACMA.No. 887 of 2007 July 14, 2017 Kv