Rajput Ummed Singh And 2 Others v. The State Of Telangana And Another

/ 13251 l

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY .

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6078 OF 2019 Between:

1. Rajput Ummed Singh and 2 Others, S/o Bheem Singh, aged about 25 years, OcC. Business(Artificial Jewellery Business), R/o. H.No.4-B-721 , lll floor, Behind Nandini Hotel, Gowliguda, Hyderabad, Nio. Keshwana (vill), Jalore(Dist), Rajasthan.

2. Bhawar Singh Rajpurohit, S/o Sovel Singh, age.24 years, Occ. Business (Artificial Jewellery Business), R/o H.No.'15-5-259, Osman shahi, .Gowliguda Chaman, Hyderabad, N/o Noon(vill), Jalore(Dist), Rajasthan.

3. Praveen Singh, S/o Shanker lal, age 24 yeats, Occ. Business(Home Appliances), R/oH.No,15-4-122/2, Osman Shahi, Hyderabad, N/o.Sarat(vill), Jalore(Dist), Rajasthan ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED 2 TO 4 AND

1. The State of Telangana and Another, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, Telangana High Court Hyderabad, ....RESPONDENT

2. Sri Kantilal, S/o.Bhavani Shanker, aged about 35 years, occ. Business, R/o H.No.89, 2nd floor, Babannagali, Akkipet Cross, Banglore-560053. ... DE FACTO/COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT.2 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash PRC No.22712019 dated 05-07-2019 on the file of Xll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, in view of the compromise between the petitioners and defacto complainants in pursuance of the lMemorandum of Compromise executed on 27.O7.2019.

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in PRC No.22712019 dt 05-07-2019 on the file of the Xll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad till the disposal of the main Criminal Petition.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lvlemorandum of Grounds. of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments ' of Sri Suresh Shiv Sagar, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Vivekananda Reddy, Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No 1 The Court made the following: ORDER t,

TIIE IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SUREIIDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.607 8 0r. 2019 ORD' ER:

This Criminal petition is filed by the petitioners seeking to quash proceedings in pRC.No.22Z of 2019, on the file of XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad. 2.

Heard the leaned counsel for Sri M.Vivekananda Reddy, learned the petitioners and Assistant public Prosecutor for respondent_ State.

3'

The case was at the stage of pRC and the same has been committed to Sessions Court by the learned Magistrate. 4.

Since the case has been already committed to Sessions Court by the learned Magistrate, the cause in the present case does not suMve lor adjudication.

5.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed i SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYI SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Xll Addl. Chief Nletropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.

2. The Station House Officer, Nampally Police Station, Hyderabad.

3. Two CCs to The Public Prosecutor, Telangana High Court Hyderabad.[OUT]

4. One CC to Sri Suresh Shiv Sagar, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Cbpies SR/PSL w

t ( \.

HIGH COURT DATED:2810212025 1n€ S T,1 ( ( 2t o t , fiAy t !tr i splTCHE

ORDER

CRLP.No.6078 of 2019 CRIMINAL PETITION tS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS f,@85 Yl-61er z 1o\-\