Chamanthula Usha , Usha Laxmi v. Kasturi Kesari And ANR
/ [ 3300 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY Two rHousAND AND rwrrurvrHCeL PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA .A.C.M.A.No, Appeal Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the Order and r;:e *l,ll;l iI o 11123 or 2005 dated 23_07_2oo7on the fire of the court Judge (FTC), Khammam.
Accident claims Tribunal-cum-lv Additional District Between:
sfixHis:ift ,**:,9,#::ft ,,-"ffi ,p^i:lx,:,,?,*;,fl :t'B?$,fl iyears,occ: AND ...APPELLANT/CLAIM PETITONER " IiTj fliffii,:",ffi i,";.gg8T;pi?.T;lfru.a;u*g No Ap 24 ''11riJ,"-5'"X1:#'s"t[E*s;klf;{ii"irf 3,,,{:Ri:Hf,:H,istBlica[,choff ce (R-i dismissed for default vide Court Order dated 19.07.2016) sR' s Es HAG'R' *ff :il :::l'" .'' NDEN rs "#',::;: il:,:;
No'2: sMT' l' lttAAMu vANr llowing: JUDGMENT The court derivered rn" ro,nt
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA M.A.C.M.A.No. 2610 0F oo7 JUDG ENT:
of granting repeated adjournments no one In spite behalf of the appellant, though the matter is appeared on under the caption "For Dismissal"' None listed todaY that the appellant has no interest to appeared. It seems pursue the aPPeal'
Underthesecircumstances,thisMACMAisdismissedfor non Prosecution '
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Applications' if any' pending There shall be no order as to costs'
shall stand closed '
SD','P'PADuAN+BREI'EERRX '/ ,[RUE COPY"
SECTIO OFFICER
1. The Chairman' Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-lV Additional District To, Judge (Frc), KhammTjl'ff::J:llo,o"u* toPucl
2. One CC to Sri Seshagiri
3. One CC to Smt l Maamu Vani' Advocate [OPUCI
4. Two CD CoPies gbr \
HIGH COURT DATED: 0610112023 /.\ t\'i rl iA r6 c t t!,, :J [ 3 I'lJ ?u8 '5.....
\_;,: .
\\',
JUDGMENT
MACMA.No'2610 of 2007 DISMISSING THE MACMA AS INFRUCTUOUS & 1\ e>