Sri B.P.L.Narasimhan, Son Of B.S.Parthasarath v. The State Of Telangana,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 324 OF 2015 Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 & 400 of Cr.P.C. against the Order dated 30.12.2014 in O.P. 625 of 201 1 M.C.No. 194 of 2010 & M.C.No.251 of 2011 on the file of the Judge, Additional Family Court, Hyderabad. Between:

Sri B.P.L.Narasimhan, Son of B.S. Parthasarath, Occupation: retired, Resident of FIat 401 , Bougainvillea, 7-1-53, Dharam Karan Road, Ameerpet, Hyderabad 500016.

...PETITIONEFY PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana,, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad.

2. Sarvajit Narasimhan, Son of B.P.L.Narasimhan, Occupation:- Pvt. Service, Rl/o. Flat No. 312,Anuradha Apartments, 8-3-89215, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad 500073 ...RESPONDENT NO,2/ RESPONDENT CRLRCMP. NO: 505 OF 2015 Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to pay an interim maintenance of Rs.15,0001 per month to the petitioner during the pendency of the main appeal against the order M.C.No. 251 of 2O1'l in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri M. NARSIMHA, rep. M/S. NOMOS VISTAS THE LAWYERS I Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR I Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 : M/S. G. KALYAN CHAKARVARTHY The Gourt made the following: ORDER

HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA AND HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.324 OF 2015 ORDER: Per Hon'ble Dr. Justice Chillakur Suntctlttthu) Challenge in this Criminal Revision Case is the order that is rendered by the Additional Family Court, Hyderabad, in M.C.No.2S1 of 2011, dated 30.12.2014.

2.

Sri M.Narsimha, learned counsel, representing Nomos Vistas The Lawyers, which is on record representing the petitioner, states that in the light oi the death of the petitioner, the Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous.

3.

Recording the submission thus made, the Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed.

4.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, I shall stand closed.

tSd/. I. NAGA LAKSHMI -DEPUTY REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Judge, Additional Family Court' Hyderabad'

2. One CC to M/S' NOMOS VISTAS THE LAWYERS' Advocate IOPUCI 3.-One CC to M/S' G' KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY' Advocate IOPUCI 4TwoCCstothePublicProsecutor,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad. (OUT)

5. Two CD CoPies Njb q

HIGH COURT DT.CSL,J & DT.GRR,J DATED:2710412023 $e STA ie:

Y -v Joo 26 JUflMI ,^ /

ORDER

\,, CRLRC.No.324 of 2015 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS @-"f,tW