Mohammed Ghaiyas Uddin v. The State Of Telangana And 3 Others
[ 3302 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 21435 OF 2019 Between:
It/ohammed Ghaiyas Uddin, S/o lVohd. Sirajuddin, Aged 32 years, Occ. Business, No 1-4-71214, Tajirnagar Bholakpur, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND '1 . The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies T.S Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. The Collector (CS), Medchal-Malkajgiri District (Ranga Reddy District)
3. The Assistant Civil Supply Officer, Uppal Circle, Medchal-Malkajgiri District (Old Ranga Reddy District)
4. The Station House Officer, P.S. Nacharam, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Ranga Reddv District ...RES'.NDENTS Petltion under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one-in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in seizing the rice 300.80 Quintals worth of Rs.
4,81,280/- of the petitioner by conducting the panchanama of 12-8-2019 is illegal, improper and without any power or authority under law, and violation of Articles, '14, 16 and 19(1Xg) of the Constitution of lnd ia lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to release the seized stocks of rice 300.80 Quintals worth of Rs. 4,81,2801 under cover of panchanama of 12-8-2019 to the petitioner pending disposal of the main Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. C. SUNITHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES Counsel for the Respondent No.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH W.P.No.21435 of 2O19 t This writ petition is filed with the following prayer; "to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seizing tl:e rice 3OO.8O Quintals worth Rs.4,81,280/- of the petitioner by conducting the panchanama dated 12.a.2O19 as illegal, improper and without any power or authority under law and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 19(l)(g) of the Constitution of India".
2.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel Ibr the petitioner submits that in view of the interim orders passed by this Court in I.A.No. I of 20l9 in W.P.No.21435 of 2019 dated 27.O9.201.9, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. 3.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
l SKJ W P No 21435 of 2019 Miscellaneous Applications, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
SD/-K. SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGIS ,TRUE COPY// SECTI FFICER To,
1. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana,at Hyderabad [OUT]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES ,High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad [OUT]
3. One CC to M/s. C. SUNITHA KUN/ARI, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies B I\,,I BS .1
HIGH COUR'I DATED:2211112023 .9 i t- *$g qa {J to lJt \
ORDER
{ d * c \\ WP.No.21435 of 2019 GLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS q U