← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCC/1185/2020closed no costs

V. Ranveer Bhupal v. Smt. J. Suvartha

2021-09-06P Naveen Rao3 pages

\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD IVONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1185 OF 2020 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to "12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for willfully violating, disobeying the Order of the High Court dated. 22.06.2020 passed in W.P.No.8707 ol 2020. Between:

V. Ranveer Bhupal, S/o. Late V. Balaiah, Age 47 years, Occ. Bill Collector, Nizamabad Municipal Corporation, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District.

...Petitioner

AND Smt. J. Suvartha, Deputy Commissioner, Circle No.'13, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Khairtabad, Hyderabad. Smt. Pravinya, lAS, Zonal Commissioner, Central Zone, Circle No.13, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Khairtabad, Hyderabad. ...Contemnors/ Respondents in main W.P.

Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s S. JAGADISH Counsel for the Respondents: M/s LAKKADI DAYAKER REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER

-2THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAC) CONTEMFT CASE No.1185 of2O2O ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No'8707 of 2O2O dated 22'06'2O2O are complied.

Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed' SD/. CH.'VENKATESWARLU ./ DE:PUTY REGISTRAR ,,/ //TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER To, 1.

Smt. J. Suvartha, Deputy Commissioner' Circle No'13' Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Khairtabad' HyderaDao' r^^^ r-irelo N.] ,13 Greater . Smt. Pravinya, lAS, Zonai c""iitio""i' Central Zone' Circle No'13' Greatet 2.

il"i"iuoui Municipal Corporation' Khairt-abad'-Hyderabad' . Oire CC to M/s. S. Jagadish' Advocate [OPUUI . ffi il i" rtlit. rrr,ti'oi Davaker Reddv' Advocate [oPUC] . Two CD CoPies . One SPare CoPY tr'

J MIV TP

HIGH COURT DATED: 0610912021 .1 c T 'rA i oo m21 STP s L *

ORDER

CC.No.1185 ot 2020 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE \