M.Mallesham, Karimnagar District And 3 Others v. Secy., Bar Council Of A.P. High Court Premises, Hyd And 3 Otrs

[ 33001 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 31324 OF 2011 Between:

'1 . M.Mallesham, S/o M. Laxman, Advocate President of Advocates Bar Association Peddapalli, Rl/o Peddapalli, Karimnagar District.

2. G. Malla Reddy, S/o Raja Reddy, Advocate Vice-President of Advocates Bar Association Peddapalli, Rl/o Peddapalli, Karimnagar District.

3. N.Papaiah, S/o Brahmaiah, Advocate Secretary to Advocates Bar Association Peddapalli, Rl/o Peddapalli, Karimnagar District.

4. R. Surilsh Babu, S/o R. Bala Prasad, Advocate Jt.Secy., to the Advocates Bar Association Peddapalli, Ryo Peddapalli, Karimnagar O,.,t'",. ...rr,TlONERS AND

1. Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh, High Court of Premises, Hyderabad, Rep by its Secretary.

2. Sri Sathiah,-S/o. not known to Petitioners, Occ: Advocate, C/o Advocates Bar Association, Advocate Peddapalli, Karimnagar District.

3. E.R.Prasad Rao, S/o. not known to Petitioenrs, Occ: Advocate, No 4-2'14111' Kunaram Road, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District.

4. Sri T. Rami Reddy, S/o. not known to Petitioners, Occ: Advocate, FUo 'l-2-99' PragathiNagar,Peddapalli,KarimnagarDistrict.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or.any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the letter of the 1st Respondent issued inRoc.No.674l2011 dated 02.11.2011 in appointing the Respondents 3 and 4 as adhoc committee even though the term of the managing committee is still subsisting till 24.04.2012 and directing the Respondents 3 and 4 to conduct elections and the consequential action of the Respondents 3 and 4 in issuing the election schedule proposing to conduct the elections on 01.12.2011 , as illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction.

t.A. NO: 1 0F 2011(WPMP. NO: 38864 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including elections to the Advocates' Bar Association of Peddapalli, pursuant to the letter of the 1st Respondent issued in Roc.No.6741201 1 dated O2.11.2O11, pending disposal of the Wp. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI ALLADI RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI ASHOK GOUD PONNAM Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI GANTA RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3: - The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA TVRIT PETITION NO.31324 OF 20tL ORDER:

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the relief sought in the writ petition has become infructuous.

2.

Recording the said submission, the writ petition ls dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, t shall stand closed SD/- MOHD.

ANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to SRI ALLADI RAVINDER, Advocate tOlu.ql-..-- i: 6; dc 6 sHi cAtlrA RAMAKRISHNA, Advocate tg-1,-tlg.l.

5. il; cc 6 SRiAsHox couD PoNNAM, Advocate [oPUc]

4. Two CD CoPies PSK.

GJP Y+'

HIGH COURT DATED:2210112024

ORDER

WP.No.31324 ot 2011 1 5 FEB 2t24 .i i) ?,.

* ,:IAI CH::o DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

6 cC..-