← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/23942/2011dismissed as infructuous

Ap Sarpanchula Sangham,Karimnagar v. Govt.Of Ap,Rep.By Prl.Scy,Pr Dept,Hyd,And Another

2023-12-04K. Sarath3 pages

I I [ 3302 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH wRtT PETITION NO.23942 0F 2011 Between:

Andhra Pradesh Sarpanchula Sangham, Karimnagar, Registered No.442 of 2008, having its office at Flat No.201, Maturu Apartments, A.C.Guards, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad -500 028, Rep.by its President A.Janardhan S/o A. Narsaiah, aged 51 years, Occ: Agriculture and Sarpanch of Revalli, Gram Panchayat, Choppudandi Mandal, Karimnagar District.

...PETITIONER AND

1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (Election & Rules) Department, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad - 5OO O22

2. The Commissioner, Panchayat Raj Department, Urdu Galli, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad- 500 029 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring action of respondents relating to the issuance of impugned G.O.Ms.No.269 Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (Elecs and Rules) Department dated 22.08.201'1 issued by first respondent as arbitrary, illegal and set aside the same.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. SATYAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.2 3942 of 2OLL ORDER:

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned Government pleader for the respondents would submit that the cause in the present Writ petition does not survive and no further orders are required to passed in this matter and thereby the Writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the aforementioned submission. the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

3. As sequel to it, Miscellaneous petitions pending, if ary, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. SD/-T.JAYy'SREE ASSISTANT RE?6TRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI S. SATYAM REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to the Advocate General, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hydeiabad.-[OU!

4. Two CD Copies MP BS g

/ HIGH COURT SK,J DATED:0411212023 gE ST47 + 3 21 oE[ 20n o * cC t t) 55pa1g,\{

ORDER

WP.No.23942 ot 2011 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS @f*'atu