Guduri Sajeeva Reddy v. The State Of Telangana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY .THE TENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5964 OF 2022 Between:

1. Guduri Sajeeva Reddy, S/o Narsa Reddy aged 63 years, Occ Agriculture R/o H No 1-45 Muneerabad village Medchal Mandal and District

2. Guduri Pushpa, Wo Sa.ieeva Reddy aged 58 years, Occ House wife R/o H No 1-45 Muneerabad village Medchal Mandal and District

3. Guduri Venkat Sridhar Reddy, S/o Sajeeva Reddy aged 37 years Occ Business R/o H No 1-45 Muneerabad village Medchal tvlandal and District

4. G Udaya Latha, Wo Sridhar Reddy age 40 years Occ House wife R/o H No 2-eo-104 Machabollaram Burutonsuda.seEfl+i6i,tf$^"cusED No. 2 to A5 AND The State of Telangana , rep. by Station House Officer Medchal Police station Throuqh Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana Hyderabad Smt Dl Anuradha Wo Venkat Ariun Reddy @ Arjun age 30 years, Occ Private Job R/o H No 1-101 Sornaram village Medhcal Mandal and District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the CC NO 128 of 2O2O on the file of XXll Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate court at Medchal Cyberabad in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 1OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.

C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in CC NO 128 of 2O2O on the file of XXll Addl. Mekopolitan Magistrate court at Medhcal Cyberabad including appearance of the petitioners in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri RAMA MOHAN PALANKI ,Advocate foi the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri R. JANIKIRAM, Advocate for the I Respondent No.

HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5964 OF 2022 ORDER:

Heard, the submission oF learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2. 2.

Seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioners who are arrayed as accused as 2 to 5 in CC No.12B of 2020 pending on the file of the Court of XXII Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal, the present Criminal Petition is filed.

3.

Though the learned counsel for the petitioners argued at length in respect of the merits of the case, however finally learned counsel states that no further orders in this criminal I I I I petition are required except to dispense with the presence of the petitioners before the Trial Court. The respondents does not raise a ny objection .

4.

On the other hand, the 2nd respondent himself stated to dispense with the presence. Therefore, this Court considered the request of learned counsel for the petitioners.

-.'r..

5.

Resultantly, the criminal petition is disposed of with the following direction:

i) The Court of XXII Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Medchal is directed not to insist personal appearance oF the petitioners Nos.1 to 4 who are arrayed as accused as 2 to 5 in CC No.12B of 2020 that is pending before the said Court during the course of proceedings, in case they are represented by an advocate.

ii) However, the petitioners Nos.1 to 4/Accused Nos.2 to 5 shall make their appearance before the trial Court in case a specific direction to that effect is issued. 6.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sha ll stand closed.

SD/- L. SIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYi/ \ SECTIO OFFICER To,

1. The XXll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Medchal Cyberabad., Ranga Reddy District.

2. The Station House Officer, Medchal Police Station, Medchal - Malkajgiri Dist.

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor High Court ofTelangana at Hyderabad.(OuT)

4. One CC to SRl. RAMA MOHAN PALANKI Advocate [OPUC]

5. One CC to SRl. R. JANIKIRAM, Advocate IOPUC] \V6. Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT DT.CSLJ DATED:1 010812022 ( 1 t1E STnIe a< 14- StP D;,'

ORDER

CRLP.No.5964 of 2022 DISPOSING OT' THE CRL.PETITION.

d/ o\