Oruganti Laxminarsimham v. The State Of Telangana
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5993 OF 2022 Between:
Oruganti Laxminarsimham, S/o. O. Vidhya Shankar, Aged about 50 Year, Occ. Advocate, Rl/o No. 85, NBH Colony, Safilguda, Secunderabad. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1 . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor
2. B.A. Devender, S/o. Late B.R. Anjaiah, Agec about 56 Year, Occ. Not known R:/o.H.No. 30-66211 , Plot No. 277, Chandragiri colony, Medchal District. ...RESPONDENTNo. I&2 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash SC No '14 of 2018, Pending for disposal, under the caption of framing of charges, on the file of learned special SC/ST court, RR district at LB Nagar.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all the Proceedings, SC No. '14 of 2018 on the file of learned special SC/ST Court R.R Dist at L.B Nagar including the Presence of Petitioner/ Accused No.2 and pass such order and orders as deem This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ir/ RATHAN SINGH , Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and None Appeared for Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER
IHON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5993 of 2022 ORDER:
Heard the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public prosecutor who is representing respondent No.1. Having regard to the limited relief sought for, notice to respondent No.2 is felt not necessarSr.
2.
Seeking to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner who is arrayed as accused No.2 in SC.No. 14 of 2Ol8 that is pending on the file of the Court of Special Judge for trial of cases under SCs/STs (pOA) Act, Ranga District at L.B.Nagar, the present Criminal Petition is filed.
3.
l,earned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is arrayed as accused No.2 in SC.No. 14 of 2O18 that is pending on the file of the Court of Special Judge for trial of cases under SCs/STs (pOA) Act, Ranga District at L.B.Nagar, and indeed, the petitioner has not committed arg rcffence and a false case was foisted against him.
D..CSL.,r CrlPNo.59g3 af 2nrc However, learned counsel states that no further orders are required in this Criminal petition except to direct the trial Court to dispose of t.Ile said Sessions Case time bound. 4.
Learned Assistant public prosecutor reported no objection for passing such order.
5. A perusal of record reveals that the case was registered in t].e year 2olz and the charge sheet was laid the year 2}tg. It is a_lso 1n clear that since then, the petitioner is facing criminal proceedings. Therefore, this Court considers that there is justification in the relief sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Resultaltly, the Criminal petition is disposed of with the following direction: _ The Court of Special Judge for trial of cases under SCs/STs (pOA) Act, Ranga District at L.B.Nagar is directed to dispose of S.C.No. 14 of 2018 that is pending on the file of the said Court within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Dr.CSL, J CtlPNo.5993 of 2O22
7. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if aly, shall stand closed.
HAR RAO ISTRAR EK sD/-N "^ttTsfit?
/,TRUE COPY/I SE FFICER \ "iffi "qi$Ey*'fl#1iffi-ffit+'*i$}$i*JTl'"n"n"""* q
HIGH COURT DATED:0810712022
ORDER
CRLP.No.5993 ot 2022 2 IL * h DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION @d,'i, w-- 6.rV'