Dachepally Madhav v. State Of Telangana And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JI,'STICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5987 OF 2022 Between:
Age 65 years, Backside of Occ. Eusiness, Rythu Bazar,
1. Dachepally Madhav, S/o.Late Ramulu R/o.Sunrise Apartment, Flat No.401, Chaithanyapuri. Kothapet. R.R.District
2. Dachepally Chandra Babu, S/o.Madhav Aged about 25 yea6, Occ. Eusiness, R:/o.sunrise Apartment, Flat No.40'1, Backside of Rythu Bazar, Chaithanyapuri. Kothapet. R.R.District ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO 1 & 2 AND
1. State of Telangana and another, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Judicature
2. Bheemidi Vimala, Wo.Krishna Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ . Housewife, R/o.Vanasthalipuram- ...RESPONOENTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in C.C.No.639/2021 U/Sec. 447, 323, 5Og 1PC On the tile of the in the court of Addl. Judicial first Class Magistrate, AT Ramannapet.
l.A- NO: 1OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.639123.21 On the file of the in the court of Addl. Judicial first Class Magistrate , AT , Ramannapet. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing ttp Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Janardhan Goud Sunkari, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: OROER
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.59a7 of2022 ORDER:
The present Criminal Petition is hled seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioners in C.C.No.639 of 2O2l on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Ramannapet' 2.
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor' on written instructions, submits that the matter has been settled before l,ok-Adalat and therefore, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any' shall stand closed.
sd/- v.KAVIT+IA ASSISTANT REGTSTRAR t\ n / SECTION OFPICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. The Addl. Judicial first Class Magistrate, AT Ramannapet'
2. The SHO Chautuppal Police Station, Yadadri Bhuvangiri'
3. One CC to Sri. Janardhan Goud Sunkari, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor (TG) [OUT]
5. Two CD CoPies SR \-.
gh t\ -')i(
HIGH COURT DATED:291O2J2024 OROER CRLP.No.5987 of 2022 r\E STAr6 k c Jc r.) 1 5 APB 2!24 7zd !, Ai i)5 5;pa.1r1.\\r!o CRLP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS