Jakke Madhu Sudhan Rao v. The State Of Telangana

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY oF oCToBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6866 OF 2018 Between:

Jakke Madhu Sudhan Rao, S/o. Late. J Ram Mohan Rao, Aged 38 Years, Occ. Self employed, No 31-4-2, Rangaiah Naidu Street, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

... Petitioner/Accused AND

1. The State Of Telangana, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court For The State Of Telangana, at Hyderabad

2. CH Sridevi, W/o.Ch, Govind, Aged 40 Years, Occ. Self employed, C/o Flat No. 103, RK Apartment, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad ...RespondenUComplainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the CC.No. 16 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the lX Addl. C.M.M, Nampally, Hyderabad.

l.A NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Seclion 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No. 16 of 2017 on the file of Court of the lX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Nampally, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the present Criminal Petitron. This Petition coming on for hearing.upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri E V V S RAVI KUMAR, Advocate for the Petrtioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1, and of Sri. Rama Krishna for the Respondent No.2.

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRTMINAL PETITION No.6866 of 2018 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, t973, is filed by the petitioner/accused, seeking following relief :

"to quash C.C.No.16 of 2Ol7 on the file of Court of IX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad and pass such other order or orders..."

2.

Heard. Perused the record.

3.

The petitioner filed this criminal petition aggrieved by the order, dated 16.12.2016 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2565 of 2016 by the learned IX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 379 of IpC when the police has closed the case against the petitioner. The learned Magistrate has given reasons for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 379 of IPC. The said order warrants no interference by this Court.

4.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this criminal petition, shall stand closed.

SD/- A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /TTRUE COPY// SEC N OFFICER To, The lX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Nampally, Hyderabad The Station House Officer, Police Station Chikkadipally. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court For The State Of Telangana, at J Hyderabad. IOUT]

4. One CC to SRl. E V V S RAVI KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Copies ANV \ "k*

HIGH COURT KS, J DATED:1111012023 1rc ST:'r7'('

os ( :

> 3 I [E[ 2923 z L-l

ORDER

CRLP.No.6866 of 201ts * DE SpA"i C\r f DISMISSING OF THE CRL PETITION , rj- 2L